This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2023] NZIACDT 29, DT v Li (Li Li)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 11 December 2023, concerning Li Li, licence 201500051, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2023] NZIACDT 29
PartiesDT v Li
Decided11 December 2023
Licensed immigration adviserLi Li, licence 201500051, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions / adviser failed to provide client an opportunity to review s61 requests before lodgement, failed to indicate whether second s61 request was likely to be futile and advise of risks, and failed to have second written agreement for second s61 request / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl9a, cl9b, cl18a / HELD / first appearance before Tribunal / gravity of offending at lower end of moderate / adviser accepted all wrongdoing early / has made changes to her practice, so a repeat of conduct is unlikely / adviser has been mature and professional in disciplinary process / fee paid for second s61 request wasted / professional obligations breached are important safeguards to clients / breach had no implications for client as adviser’s mistakes did not cause client’s unlawful status or financial loss / compensation therefore not appropriate / adviser censured / ordered to pay $1,500 financial penalty / ordered to refund fees of $920”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2023] NZIACDT 29 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Li Li (licence 201500051, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources