This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2023] NZIACDT 23, ED v Dai (Yuxiang Dai)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 11 August 2023, concerning Yuxiang Dai, licence 201500074, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2023] NZIACDT 23
PartiesED v Dai
Decided11 August 2023
Licensed immigration adviserYuxiang Dai, licence 201500074, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Professional responsibilities and professional practice / conflict of interest / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s7, s442, s45, s49, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl2e, cl3c, cl5, cl6, cl26aiii, cl26c / HELD / breach of cl2e & cl3c / adviser failed to personally advise and obtain instructions from complainant, permitted unlicensed staff to exclusively engage with complainant and give immigration advice / adviser obliged to ensure unlicensed staff do not perform immigration advice work, warning not to undertake such work insufficient / adviser likely received via staff complainant’s oral consent to obtain INZ file / breach of cl26c / did not confirm in writing complainant’s discussion of material immigration matters with staff, adviser should have sent letter or text even if complainant had no email address / no breach of cl5 & cl6 / no evidence adviser received commission for referring complainant to English school / complaint partially upheld”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2023] NZIACDT 23 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Yuxiang Dai (licence 201500074, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources