This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2022] NZIACDT 21, CT v Nandan (Rupika Nandan)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 18 August 2022, concerning Rupika Nandan, licence 201401377, surrendered.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2022] NZIACDT 21
PartiesCT v Nandan
Decided18 August 2022
Licensed immigration adviserRupika Nandan, licence 201401377, surrendered

The Tribunal's published summary

“Adviser failed to provide an invoice, refund & confirm that the service contract was terminated / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s7, s442, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl22, cl24c, cl28a / HELD / adviser surrendered licence to become a lawyer / breach of cl22 / did not provide invoice for client’s payment / breach of cl24c / after surrender of licence, service contract was effectively terminated / obliged to refund deposit, less value of work done and invoiced / eventual offer to refund was 19 months after initial request / initial refusal on the basis contract prohibited refunds for change of mind contrary to cl24 / client entitled to “fair and reasonable” refund per cl24a & cl24c / breach of cl28a / did not confirm contract termination in writing / name suppression refused / presumption in favour of publication not displaced / complaint upheld”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2022] NZIACDT 21 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Rupika Nandan (licence 201401377, surrendered). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Hamilton.

Sources