This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2020] NZIACDT 26, UO v Nukulasi (Elena Tapuaiga Nukulasi)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 23 June 2020, concerning Elena Tapuaiga Nukulasi, licence 201400314, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2020] NZIACDT 26
PartiesUO v Nukulasi
Decided23 June 2020
Licensed immigration adviserElena Tapuaiga Nukulasi, licence 201400314, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions decision / negligence / adviser did not make discretionary visa application until one year after being instructed / complainant in New Zealand unlawfully / no justifiable reason for delay / adviser did not advise complainant in writing that application had little chance of success / conduct neither professional, diligent or timely / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / delay extraordinary & inexplicable / time of the essence given complainant’s unlawful status / adviser’s first appearance before Tribunal / adviser admitted wrongdoing / no evidence of actual prejudice to complainant / adviser cautioned & ordered to pay $1000 refund of fees to complainant”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2020] NZIACDT 26 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Elena Tapuaiga Nukulasi (licence 201400314, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources