This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2019] NZIACDT 30, Suresh v Elizabeth (Janine Elizabeth)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 10 May 2019, concerning Janine Elizabeth, licence 201500683, expired.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2019] NZIACDT 30
PartiesSuresh v Elizabeth
Decided10 May 2019
Licensed immigration adviserJanine Elizabeth, licence 201500683, expired

The Tribunal's published summary

“Rubber stamping / breach of professional obligations and Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act) / failure to tailor written agreement to client / delays in preparing EOI / lack of refund policy / failure to refund / s442a of the Act / negligence / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl3c, cl19e, cl19k and cl24 / Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 / Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 / adviser did not have any involvement with file / unlicensed staff processed application / obligations cannot be delegated / agreement not tailored to client’s circumstances / delay in preparing EOI unreasonable and negligent / advisor failed to offer a fair and reasonable refund / complaint upheld”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2019] NZIACDT 30 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Janine Elizabeth (licence 201500683, expired). See the full licence history on their profile.

Sources