This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2019] NZIACDT 2, E v D

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 30 January 2019.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2019] NZIACDT 2
PartiesE v D
Decided30 January 2019

The Tribunal's published summary

“Negligence / failure to assess whether business aligned with approved business plan & requirement to benefit New Zealand / failure to ensure agreement signed / application for long-term business visa / clients bought lodge after failed sale of motel / business plan based on motel / visa declined because lodge did not meet relevant criteria / complaint adviser made application with no hope of success / adviser claimed immigration advice based on purchase of motel not lodge / adviser unwell & unable to represent himself / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl8 / adviser not unfit to plead / complainant absent from process & failed to produce evidence requested by tribunal / tribunal unable to make definitive finding that advice not sought on suitability of lodge / agreement not signed but no utility to upholding complaint / adviser’s licence expired & unlikely to renew / complaint dismissed.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2019] NZIACDT 2 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

Sources