[2026] NZIACDT 41 — IM v Yu (Qian Yu)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 2 July 2026 · adviser: Qian Yu

The tribunal's published summary

Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, ss 442 / Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2014, cl8a, cl8c, cl13c, cl14, cl15a, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl19c, cl25a, cl25b, cl25c, cl25e, cl25f, cl26e, cl28c / provisional licence holder provided immigration advice without approved supervision agreement and while licence suspended / breach of cl8a and cl13c / failed to provide evidence of licence, explain provisional licence requirements, or identify supervisor / breach of cl8c, cl14 and cl19c / failed to provide and explain summary of professional responsibilities / breach of cl17a and cl17b / failed to explain significant matters in service agreement / breach of cl18b / failed to provide complaints procedure / breach of cl15a and cl17c / client funds paid into personal account, not held in separate client account, not applied for intended purpose, and not refunded / breach of cl25a, cl25b, cl25c, cl25e and cl25f / fail…

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public tribunal proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.