[2025] NZIACDT 57 — SH v McGarrigle (Zamelia McGarrigle)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 4 December 2025 · adviser: Zamelia McGarrigle

The tribunal's published summary

Sanctions / complainant engaged adviser to seek visa for adult daughter / adviser incorrectly advised complainant that the client was beyond the dependence age and could only apply for a visitor, student or work visa / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl5, cl6, cl19l, cl26f / five failures of five professional obligations / wrongdoing involved undisclosed eligibility for commission for acting as school’s agent / incorrect advice for resident visa eligibility had severe consequences for client / lack of diligence and due care / immaterial that complainant did not follow internal complaints procedure / first appearance / adviser has no insight into wrongdoing, no remorse, and offers no apology / adviser censured / no training order required as adviser relinquished licence / $1,500 financial penalty / adviser ordered to pay $9,145.25 in compensation, reflecting visa and tuition fees, and emotional harm to complainant and client

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public tribunal proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.