[2025] NZIACDT 51 — NO v Ellis (James Ellis)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 2 October 2025 · adviser: James Ellis

The tribunal's published summary

Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl26c / client engaged adviser to seek student visa / INZ declined application as it was not accepted he would be genuine student and his financial documentation was inadequate / evidence did not support allegation that adviser instructed client to create false narrative to explain gap in tertiary studies / dishonest or misleading behaviour not proven / evidence did not support allegation that adviser failed to properly review and update relevant financial documents before filing / adviser had alerted client of issues with documents on multiple occasions / however, adviser failed to confirm in writing discussions with client relating to incomplete financial evidence / breach of cl26c / adviser unprofessionally communicated with tertiary institute following decline of visa / breach of cl1 / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public tribunal proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.