[2024] NZIACDT 22 — QN v Nandan (Rupika Nandan)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 29 August 2024 · adviser: Rupika Nandan

The tribunal's published summary

Conflict of interest and professional practice / Code of Conduct 2014, cl18a, cl26aiii, cl26b, cl26d, cl26e, cl26f, cl29a, cl31a / HELD / Tribunal declined Registrar to cross-examine adviser in complainant’s absence / dishonesty and withholding information complaints cannot be sustained without complainant’s evidence, dismissed / disciplinary threshold / breach of cl26b but does not warrant disciplinary action / client knew of visa decision regardless / breach of cl18, cl26aiii, cl26d & cl26e but does not warrant disciplinary action / inadequate response to Registrar explained (not excused) by inadequate file and being overseas; inadequate file itself and lack of written agreement explained (not excused) by relationship with client (employee and friend) / breach of cl5 & cl6 by acting for employee without disclosure in writing and written consent / complaint partially upheld

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public tribunal proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.