[2024] NZIACDT 17 — LB v Luv (Kay Luv)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 23 May 2024 · adviser: Kay Luv

The tribunal's published summary

Diligence and due care / professional responsibilities and professional practice / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl9b, cl20a, cl24a, cl24b, cl24c, cl25a, cl25f, cl26b / HELD / no breach cl1 / insufficient evidence adviser did not realise complainant’s work experience was ineligible for points under skilled migrant category / breach of cl9b / adviser did not inform complainant of futility of application / no written acknowledgement from complainant of such advice / complainant’s general text message or signature on service agreement insufficient / no breach of cl20a / breach of cl24a / adviser failed to offer refund when services terminated or when complainant requested refund / no breach of cl24b, cl25a and cl25f / adviser entitled to fee in accordance with service agreement / breach of cl26b / adviser tardy in communications with complainant / delays not justified by holiday period and other personal and professional commitments / complaint partially upheld

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public tribunal proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.