[2022] NZIACDT 29 — EQ v McCarthy (Christopher Mark McCarthy)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 19 December 2022 · adviser: Christopher Mark McCarthy

The tribunal's published summary

Diligence and due care / adviser failed to maintain client’s confidence and trust / ceased engaging, did not carry out instructions & did not appropriately withdraw from providing services / filed incomplete EOIs without instructions or written agreement & did not provide updates / did not provide client file to new adviser or IAA / failed to follow internal complaints procedure & provide fair and reasonable refund / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl2e, cl15b, cl24c, cl26b, cl26e, cl26f, cl27b, cl28c / HELD / psychologist’s report on adviser does not evidence complete inability to act, could have advised client to seek alternative assistance / ill-health not a defence in this case but will mitigate sanctions / required to obtain instructions and express written approval for each immigration application / should have refunded fair and reasonable amount when ceasing services / complaint upheld

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public tribunal proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.