[2020] NZIACDT 37 — TTD v Zheng (Cheng Zheng)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 7 September 2020 · adviser: Cheng Zheng

The tribunal's published summary

Dishonest or misleading behaviour / student visa / adviser filed with INZ letter from complainant’s employer to INZ falsely stating she had been granted leave to study in New Zealand and her position would be kept open / whether adviser knew complainant had already resigned at time of filing letter with INZ / whether adviser’s explanation to INZ honest / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl31 / adviser’s conduct in guiding complainant to compile letter suspicious but no evidence refuting he did not know complainant had resigned before sending letter / false explanation given by adviser to INZ / professional person need not resign on knowing evidence filed false, but expected to help check by providing honest explanation to INZ / adviser should have terminated instructions instead of sending letter with false statement / complaint upheld.

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public tribunal proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.