[2020] NZIACDT 1 — TI(G)M v Hanning (Anne Marie Hanning)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 9 January 2020 · adviser: Anne Marie Hanning

The tribunal's published summary

Failure to have written agreement with client / failure to exercise diligence & due care / negligence / complainant held a work visa but had no income for a period due to issues with employer / complainant offered permanent employment & applied for South Island Contribution Visa / INZ sent PPI letter advising lack of income and that employment agreement did not clearly state guaranteed minimum hours / visa declined because complainant did not appear to be a bona fide candidate / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl18a, cl 18d / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / adviser did not conduct herself with due diligence or care & failed to respond in a timely manner to PPI letter / adviser should have checked agreement and identified lack of income issue before application was filed / workload & poor health no defence / adviser should have declined work / new or updated written agreement required for new visa category / complaint upheld.

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public tribunal proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.